After winning a patent case, VirnetX asked the judge to order Apple to stop using technology inside its iOS and Mac chat apps.
For some firms, winning $625 million from Apple isn't enough of a gift.
On Wednesday, VirnetX asked a Lone-Star State choose to order Apple to stop working iMessage and FaceTime whereas their patent case goes to charm. Previously, VirnetX was awarded $625 million within the case once it convinced the jury that Apple committed violation. If the choose grants the injunction, Apple are going to be forced to either suspend iMessage and FaceTime or realize a unpunctual workaround to the proprietary technology.
One of the patents in question involves establishing secure communications through net domain names. In soliciting for the injunction, VirnetX argued that though forcing a corporation to stop working 2 of its most well liked services could appear excessive, it’s necessary as a result of the infringement has done “irreparable harm” to VirnetX.
In 2012, VirnetX was awarded $368 million in damages in a {very} very similar case against Apple. In 2014, VirnetX was on the verge of winning a royalty of one % of all iPhone and iPad sales. However, each the $368 million and also the iPhone royalty were upset on charm.
Apple has antecedently told Fortune that it believes VirnetX’s claims to the patent is invalid, which this proceedings solely echoes “the desperate would like for patent reform.”
VirnetX has been labeled as a “patent troll,” or a lawyer-led company that just exists to accumulate phony patents to require larger firms to court and find hefty settlements. Naturally, VirnetX’s CEO rejects this label.
Why this matters: though injunctions throughout violation cases don't seem to be uncommon, they need decrease frequent since a 2006 Supreme Court call in favor of eBay. If the Lone-Star State judges follows that SCOTUS call, it’s unlikely that AN injunction are going to be granted.
Because VirnetX’s previous multimillion-dollar win was upset on charm, the corporate is also victimization this injunction to stop that from happening again—basically to scare Apple far from contesting the $625 million call.
